 |
Title Creating Congruence Between the Faculty Role and Institutional Expectations, Recognitions and RewardsExcerpt: Institutional harmony and efficiency can be greatly enhanced by ensuring that institutional expectations of faculty (as defined by the faculty body) are overtly shared and clearly defined. They should also align with institutional reward (promotion, tenure and merit) and recognition systems (awards etc.). By studying this article and its linked resources, and by using the associated shared files, you will be able to: • Design a process to help clarify faculty expectations and create better alignment between expectations and their rewards and recognition at your institution. • Constitute and charge a task force to examine expectations of faculty at your… |
|
| Author(s): Graham Glynn | Date last modified: June 8, 2019 | |
| Categories: Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Featured, President’s Office Staff | ||
| Tags: Faculty role, Human Resources, Institutional Awards, Institutional Harmony, Institutional rewards, Rubric | ||
Creating Congruence Between the Faculty Role and Institutional Expectations, Recognitions and Rewards by Graham Glynn is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Comments on “Creating Congruence Between the Faculty Role and Institutional Expectations, Recognitions and Rewards”