Institutional harmony and efficiency can be greatly enhanced by ensuring that institutional expectations of faculty (as defined by the faculty body) are overtly shared and clearly defined. They should also align with institutional reward (promotion, tenure and merit) and recognition systems (awards etc.). This paper addresses a process to create this congruence and provides links to supporting resource documents including a white paper to charge a task force and a sample task force report. Some follow up suggestions on how the task force report can be used to effect change are listed. Read the full article at https://hellocommunity.net/peer-review-article/creating-congruence-between-the-faculty-role-and-institutional-expectations-recognitions-and-rewards/.
Categories: Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Featured