Month: October 2026

Member Resource File Shared: Fast Track Tenure Policy

Posted on By Graham Glynn
Member Resource File Shared: Fast Track Tenure Policy

The Fast Track Tenure Policy offers a sample policy for implementing a fast-track tenure process as an alternative to appointment with tenure during faculty searches. Access to the file requires a free HELLO Community account, with registration details provided.

Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Recurrent

Peer-Reviewed Paper Published: Creating Congruence Between the Faculty Role and Institutional Expectations, Recognitions and Rewards

Posted on By Graham Glynn
Peer-Reviewed Paper Published: Creating Congruence Between the Faculty Role and Institutional Expectations, Recognitions and Rewards

Enhancing institutional harmony requires clearly defined faculty expectations aligned with rewards and recognition systems. By investigating these dynamics, institutions can establish task forces to clarify roles, share best practices, and improve hiring and promotion processes. This alignment ultimately aims to boost faculty morale and understanding across various groups.

Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Featured, Recurrent

Peer-Reviewed Paper Published: Strategically Managing Allocation of Faculty Lines and Types Across Departments and Colleges – A Risk Based Model

Posted on By Graham Glynn
Peer-Reviewed Paper Published: Strategically Managing Allocation of Faculty Lines and Types Across Departments and Colleges – A Risk Based Model

The article discusses strategic management of faculty allocation across university departments, emphasizing the Provost’s role. It explores budgeting variations, effects of adjunct faculty, course scheduling efficiency, and the breakeven point for course sections. Additionally, it advocates for data-driven allocation models while considering accreditation standards and human impact in decision-making.

Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), President’s Office Staff, Recurrent

Blog: The Visionary Servant Leader – A contradiction in Terms?

Posted on By Graham Glynn No Comments on Blog: The Visionary Servant Leader – A contradiction in Terms?
Blog: The Visionary Servant Leader – A contradiction in Terms?

It is common on job advertisements, especially for cabinet level positions and deans, for institutions to ask that candidates be both a servant leader and a visionary/entrepreneur. It seems to me that a person with a vision has ideas about where they want to take the institution.

…

Read More “Blog: The Visionary Servant Leader – A contradiction in Terms?” »

Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Foundation/Development Staff, Need a new type for me, Office Director’s Staff (Director, Assoc./Assist. Director, Coordinator, etc.), President’s Office Staff, Recurrent, University Board Member, Vice President IT Staff (VP, Assoc./Assist. VP, etc.), Vice President Student Affairs Staff (VP, Assoc./Assist. VP, etc.)
For the best experience, this site is best viewed on a full-sized monitor.