Read the complete article, comment, and share on social media at Developing Equitable and Effective Faculty Teaching, Advising, Service, and Research Workload Policy and Practices
The largest single expense at a university is faculty salaries. It is the responsibility of the administration to ensure that faculty human resources are managed well from fiscal, resource optimization, and faculty morale perspectives. To achieve this requires a clear definition, communication, and implementation of workload policies and management practices in teaching, advising, research and scholarship. By studying this article and its linked resources, and by using the associated shared files, you will be able to: • Describe the different components of faculty workload, workload effort distributions, and how they are used in the faculty evaluation processes. • Describe how faculty workload varies with appointment type, rank and may evolve with seniority. • Create a concise table that communicates clearly to the faculty, expected teaching, research, and scholarly workload by appointment type, rank, and administrative appointment. • Explain the advantages and disadvantages of faculty overloads and create an appropriate policy to manage it. • Explain how courses vary in type and the impact student enrollments and course caps have on workload. • Explain the impact of new course development, development for a new form of delivery, team teaching, and the number of unique course sections taught per semester have on faculty workload. • Develop an equitable policy to ensure faculty receive credit for all appropriate aspects of their teaching effort and ensures individual faculty workload is evenly distributed across different departments and colleges. • Explain the relative advantages and disadvantages of staff vs. faculty advisors, and good practices for placement and workload for professional staff. • Develop a policy for faculty advising workload and how it might be interchangeable with teaching workload. • Explain the various components and relative demands of faculty service, the impact of career stage on faculty participation, and how service expectations at the department, college, and university levels can be balanced. • Explain the role of scholarship within higher education, how productivity is measured, and how expectations can be clearly communicated. • Develop a policy that enables chairs to flexibly manage faculty workload so that assignments cater to the strengths of individual faculty but overall departmental productivity is maintained. • Develop a plan and implement a process to have faculty workload reviewed at an institution.
The above peer-reviewed paper was published on the Higher Education Leadership Learning Online (HELLO) Community. The HELLO Community is an international, peer led and fed organization whose vision is “to become the resource of choice for higher education leaders when seeking practical information about performing their jobs with excellence”. HELLO is an information aggregator of articles, books, useful web sites and events, a powerful set of networking tools, and an open source online journal focused on practical solutions to higher ed management and leadership issues. Community membership is required for complete access to resources and is restricted to those who hold or have held a higher ed leadership position. There is no cost, advertising, or membership data sharing with other organizations.
- Register to become a member (you can quickly register and login using your LinkedIn or Facebook account)
- 10-minute video overview of the features and tools of the community site
- New member welcome page
- Advisory Board members
Categories: Chief Academic Affairs Office Staff, Dean’s Office Staff (Deans, Executive Deans, Associate/Assistant Deans, etc.), Department Chair Office Staff (Chairs, Assistant Chairs, Program Directors, etc.), Recurrent
You must be logged in to post a comment.